Химический Али wrote:

Причем ссылаются на какие-то 7 принципов Друпала, которые автор якобы нарушил. Конституцию, блин, нашли...

Принципы есть. Один из них - не дублировать то, что уже есть без веской на то причины.

<a href="mailto:fasdalf@fasdalf.ru">fasdalf@fasdalf.ru</a> wrote:

Чем оно от BOOST отличается-то?

The management of writing of pages is different from that of boost. It to recreate not the cache by relationship a node, or term, but considers that an url = a page, that it is node or term or the other.

----------------------

sebyoga - May 4, 2009 - 13:08

My module is differents for many raison :

There is an interface to manage cache at present put in cache. It is possible to forbid the stake in cache for a given page. It is possible for a given page, to put it in cache with a different expiration. There is a toolbar in front to admin cache page for current page.

The management of writing of pages is different from that of boost. It to recreate not the cache by relationship a node, or term, but considers that an url = a page, that it is node or term or the other.

You can disable cache for any page or domain.tld...

Of it made, an url of the style: domain.tld > / term-raw / term-raw / nodetitleraw will be in cache under the shape
Dir ( domaine.tld ) = > Dir (term-raw) = > Dir (term-> raw) = > nodetitleraw.html

With boost, the modulates create has directory term, has directory node, ...

----------------------

Best translation effort: Cache Static creates a cached version of a viewable page, Boost creates a cached version of page components. Also, Cache Static has a variety of administrative interfaces intended to provide fine-grained control for what pages are cached.

-----------------------

The main difference between Boost and Cache Static is a database table.